Changing Morality in Changing Times: Superficial vs. Sensible Values

Posted by

Based on John Stuart Mill’s harm principle & the principle of taking the middle path as in Buddhism, I have come up with the following differences between superficial values and deep/ sensible values.

Superficial valuesDeep values
They are rigid and dogmatic rules.They’re flexible and based on logic.
They arise out of a need for fitting in with society, or religious doctrines. They arise out of applying the harm principle.
Anything risky is forbidden. Examples:Risks are to be mitigated through balance and emphasis on not overdoing. Examples:
Don’t drink or smoke .Do it, but don’t get addicted.
Don’t have sex/ be celibate.Do it, but safely and don’t get addicted.
Don’t wear short clothes.Do it, but not in unsafe places.
Don’t talk rudely with anyone.Do it only when its needed. Don’t hurt people intentionally. Learn non-confrontational but effective communication styles.
Don’t eat meat/ non-veg food.Eat, but less.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.